University of Worcester Worcester Research and Publications
 
  USER PANEL:
  ABOUT THE COLLECTION:
  CONTACT DETAILS:

Ethics of Engagement and Insider-Outsider Perspectives: Issues and Dilemmas in Cross-Cultural Interpretation

Dhillon, Jaswinder and Thomas, N. (2018) Ethics of Engagement and Insider-Outsider Perspectives: Issues and Dilemmas in Cross-Cultural Interpretation. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. ISSN 1743-727X Online: 1743-7288 (In Press)

[img] Text
IJRME accepted August 2018.docx - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (66kB) | Request a copy
[img] Text
IJRME accepted August 2018.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (177kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This article offers insights into the ethics of engagement and methodological issues and dilemmas in cross-cultural interpretation for researchers who are positioned at different points of the insider-outsider spectrum. The discussion uses examples from qualitative research with Sikh families in Britain and focuses on the design of the methodology and co-interpretation of data from in-depth interviews, both during the interactive data gathering phase and the post-interview analysis and interpretation phase. The researchers represent differing degrees of insider-outsiderness in relation to the British Sikh community; one is a cultural insider (a Sikh) whilst the other is an outsider (non-Sikh). In other respects they share a number of characteristics, including gender, a history of migration, bilingualism and living and teaching in superdiverse communities which all impact on the nature of their engagement with the research participants and with each other as co-researchers. Our reflexive analysis shows that established binary distinctions and polarities in research practice, such as insider/outsider, are inadequate for conceptualising the fluidity and complexity of the ethics of engagement in co-researching. We argue that both theoretically and empirically a more nuanced conceptualisation reflects the realities of multiple researcher positionalities, interpretations and power relations.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information:

The full-text cannot be supplied for this item.

Uncontrolled Keywords: ethics, qualitative research, insider-outsider, reflexivity, co-interpretation, co-researching
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics
H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races
J Political Science > JV Colonies and colonization. Emigration and immigration. International migration
L Education > L Education (General)
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
Divisions: Academic Departments > Institute of Education
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Jaswinder Dhillon
Date Deposited: 25 Sep 2018 12:43
Last Modified: 25 Sep 2018 12:43
URI: https://eprints.worc.ac.uk/id/eprint/7094

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
 
     
Worcester Research and Publications is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.