University of Worcester Worcester Research and Publications
 
  USER PANEL:
  ABOUT THE COLLECTION:
  CONTACT DETAILS:

Systematic Review of Sport Coaches’ and Teachers’ Perceptions and Application of Game-Based and Constraints-Led Pedagogy: A Qualitative MetaStudy

Richardson, S. J., McRobert, A. P., Vinson, Don ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3116-4828, Cronin, C. J., Lee, C. and Roberts, S. J. (2023) Systematic Review of Sport Coaches’ and Teachers’ Perceptions and Application of Game-Based and Constraints-Led Pedagogy: A Qualitative MetaStudy. Quest. ISSN Print: 0033-6297 Electronic: 1543-2750

[thumbnail of Systematic review complete version.pdf (DV).pdf] Text
Systematic review complete version.pdf (DV).pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (551kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of Systematic Review of Sport Coaches  and Teachers  Perceptions and Application of Game-Based and Constraints-Led Pedagogy  A Qualitative Meta-Study.pdf]
Preview
Text
Systematic Review of Sport Coaches and Teachers Perceptions and Application of Game-Based and Constraints-Led Pedagogy A Qualitative Meta-Study.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

This study represents the first comprehensive qualitative systematic review on sport coaches’ and teachers’ perceptions and application of Game-Based Approaches (GBA) and Constraints-Led Approach (CLA). From searching 12 electronic academic databases from 1982 to 2020, 29 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the metastudy. Data revealed studies were conducted in several different countries, and case study design was the predominant methodology. The main data collection method reported was cross-sectional interviews. There were inconsistencies in the quality of reporting methodologies, sampling procedures, data analysis, and assessing quality. The metatheory analysis identified weaknesses in the methodological and conceptual approaches, and a low number of studies stated philosophical perspectives. The meta-synthesis identified assumptions about learning, pedagogical knowledge and skills, content knowledge, and support as the overarching themes reported to impact coaches’ and teachers’ perceptions and application of GBAs and CLA. Finally, some recommendations for future research and practice are provided.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information:

© 2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.

Uncontrolled Discrete Keywords: Game-based approach, Constraints-led approach, Systematic review
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Divisions: College of Business, Psychology and Sport > School of Sport and Exercise Science
Related URLs:
Copyright Info: Open Access article
Depositing User: Don Vinson
Date Deposited: 24 Oct 2023 10:57
Last Modified: 24 Oct 2023 10:57
URI: https://eprints.worc.ac.uk/id/eprint/13339

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
 
     
Worcester Research and Publications is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.