Gilbert, Beverley ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6288-2019 (2025) Examining peer mentoring with women who experience multiple and complex disadvantage: a feminist ethical model of practice. Journal of Gender Studies. pp. 1-14. ISSN Print: 0958-9236 Electronic: 1465-3869
Text (Author Upload)
Journal of Gender Studies peer mentoring feminist ethical model.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) | Request a copy |
|
Preview |
Text
Binder1.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Despite the recognized strengths and benefits of peer mentoring as a process, this practice remains an underexplored area for women in communities who experience multiple and complex disadvantage linked to trauma. This article explores the perspectives of those who deliver and receive peer mentoring, with the aim of building a more comprehensive understanding of such practice in developing a model of peer mentoring based on feminist ethics of care. Three women’s organizations located in England participated in this study and in-depth, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with decision makers (n = 5), peer mentors (n = 11) and mentees (n = 8). This research is framed within feminist qualitative research where reflexive thematic analysis considered the findings from the data collected from 24 interviews (Braun & Clarke, 2022). The findings from this study identify that peer mentoring is a complex form of community level support that provides a welcome approach from the more formal, statutory, community provision many women with multiple and complex disadvantage experience. A feminist ethical model of delivery is devised within this article to be considered within women’s sector community practice. The elements of the model being: community strength, meeting expressed need and having clear feminist ethical foundations of trust and care.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | Sustainable development goals; SDG 3: Good health and well-being, SDG 5: Gender equality, SDG 10: Reduced inequalities |
Uncontrolled Discrete Keywords: | peer mentoring, feminist ethics, community, complex disadvantage |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman |
Divisions: | College of Business, Psychology and Sport > School of Psychology |
Related URLs: | |
Copyright Info: | © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group., This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
Depositing User: | Beverley Gilbert |
Date Deposited: | 23 Jan 2025 13:56 |
Last Modified: | 23 Jan 2025 13:56 |
URI: | https://eprints.worc.ac.uk/id/eprint/14521 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |