Expert Insight into the Assessment of Competence in Cognitive–behavioural Therapy: a Qualitative Exploration of Experts' Experiences, Opinions and Recommendations

To offer insight into how cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) competence is defined, measured and evaluated and to highlight ways in which the assessment of CBT competence could be further improved, the current study utilizes a qualitative methodology to examine CBT experts’ (N = 19) experiences of conceptualizing and assessing the competence of CBT therapists. Semi-structured interviews
were used to explore participants’ experiences of assessing the competence of CBT therapists. Interview
transcripts were then analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis in order to identify commonalities and differences in the way CBT competence is evaluated. Four superordinate themes were
identified: (i) what to assess, the complex and fuzzy concept of CBT competence; (ii) how to assess
CBT competence, selecting from the toolbox of assessment methods; (iii) who is best placed to assess
CBT competence, expertise and independence; and (iv) pitfalls, identifying and overcoming assessment
biases. Priorities for future research and ways in which the assessment of CBT competence could be further improved are discussed in light of these findings.