University of Worcester Worcester Research and Publications
 
  USER PANEL:
  ABOUT THE COLLECTION:
  CONTACT DETAILS:

Evidence-Based Practice in Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review of Barriers, Enablers and Interventions.

Scurlock-Evans, Laura ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9819-5031, Upton, Penney and Upton, Dominic (2014) Evidence-Based Practice in Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review of Barriers, Enablers and Interventions. Physiotherapy, 100 (3). pp. 208-219. ISSN Print: 0031-9406 Online: 1873-1465

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

Background: Despite clear benefits of the Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) approach to ensuring quality and consistency of care, its uptake within physiotherapy has been inconsistent.

Objectives: Synthesise the findings of research into EBP barriers, facilitators and interventions in physiotherapy and identify methods of enhancing adoption and implementation.

Data sources: Literature concerning physiotherapists’ practice between 2000-2012 was systematically searched using: Academic Search Complete, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature Plus, American Psychological association databases, Medline, Journal Storage, and Science Direct. Reference lists were searched to identify additional studies.

Study selection: Thirty-two studies, focusing either on physiotherapists’ EBP knowledge, attitudes or implementation, or EBP interventions in physiotherapy were included.

Data extraction and synthesis: One author undertook all data extraction and a second author reviewed to ensure consistency and rigour. Synthesis was organised around the themes of EBP barriers/enablers, attitudes, knowledge/skills, use and interventions.

Results: Many physiotherapists hold positive attitudes towards EBP. However, this does not necessarily translate into consistent, high-quality EBP. Many barriers to EBP implementation are apparent, including: lack of time and skills, and misperceptions of EBP.

Limitations: Only studies published in the English language, in peer-reviewed journals were included, thereby introducing possible publication bias. Furthermore, narrative synthesis may be subject to greater confirmation bias.

Conclusion and implications: There is no “one-size fits all” approach to enhancing EBP implementation; assessing organisational culture prior to designing interventions is crucial. Although some interventions appear promising, further research is required to explore the most effective methods of supporting physiotherapists’ adoption of EBP.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information:

Staff and students at the University of Worcester can access the full-text via Library Search. External users should check availability with their local library or Interlibrary Requests Service.

Uncontrolled Discrete Keywords: evidence-based practice, Physiotherapists, best practices, review, decision making, practice-research gap
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: College of Business, Psychology and Sport > School of Psychology
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Laura Scurlock-Evans
Date Deposited: 25 Mar 2014 14:38
Last Modified: 17 Jun 2020 17:03
URI: https://eprints.worc.ac.uk/id/eprint/3043

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
 
     
Worcester Research and Publications is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.