University of Worcester Worcester Research and Publications

Consequences Count: Against Absolutism at the End of Life

Snelling, Paul ORCID: (2004) Consequences Count: Against Absolutism at the End of Life. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 46 (4). pp. 350-357. ISSN Print: 0309-2402 Online: 1365-2648

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)


Background.  There has been a considerable amount of debate in the nursing literature about euthanasia, and especially the distinctions between acts and omissions, and killing and letting die. These distinctions are required by opponents of euthanasia to justify allowing some cases of passive euthanasia while forbidding all cases of active euthanasia.

Aim.  This paper adds to the debate by arguing that the position that absolutely forbids euthanasia is theoretically inconsistent.

Methods.  The paper first considers the place of moral theory in analysing moral problems, within the framework of the principles of biomedical ethics. It is argued that despite a moral pluralism that operates in many areas, the legal status of euthanasia is based upon an absolute deontological position against deliberate killing, which cannot be overridden by appeals to favourable consequences. In order that certain forms of passive euthanasia can be allowed, this position allows distinctions within three pairs of concepts – acts and omissions, killing and letting die, and ordinary and extraordinary means. A further method of justifying certain actions near the end of life is the doctrine of double effect. These paired concepts and the doctrine of double effect are analysed with special reference to their consequences.

Conclusion.  The application of the doctrine of double effect and the three distinctions relies on consideration of their consequences, allowing in practice what in theory is denied. This is important because it weakens the absolute case against euthanasia, which disallows any direct consequentialist appeal. If consequences count in the application of the doctrine and the distinctions, then they should also count directly prior to their application. This strengthens the argument for active euthanasia in certain cases.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information:

Staff and students at the University of Worcester can access the full-text via the Summon service. External users should check availability with their local library or Interlibrary Requests Service.

Uncontrolled Discrete Keywords: euthanasia, consequences, killing, letting die, doctrine of double effect, nursing
Subjects: R Medicine > RT Nursing
Divisions: College of Health, Life and Environmental Sciences > School of Nursing and Midwifery
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Paul Snelling
Date Deposited: 23 Dec 2013 17:07
Last Modified: 17 Jun 2020 17:02

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Worcester Research and Publications is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.