Francis-Smythe, Jan (1999) On the Relationship Between Time Management and Time Estimation. The British Journal of Psychology, 90 (3). pp. 333-347. ISSN 0007-1269
Preview |
PDF
timexpBJP.pdf Download (151kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The study explores the relationship between people's self-report of the use of time management practices and estimates of task duration. The hypothesis is that those who are good time managers will be good at estimating how long a future task will take (expected), how long a previously executed task has taken (retrospective) and how long a task is taking while in process (prospective). In the expected setting results indicate that those who perceive themselves as good time managers are most accurate at estimating the duration of a future task, of those who do not perceive themselves as good time managers some grossly overestimate and many underestimate to quite a considerable extent. The latter finding thus provides support for the 'planning fallacy' (Kahneman & Tversky,1979). In the prospective setting results indicate those who perceive themselves as good time managers tend to underestimate time passing. It is suggested that this is a motivational strategy designed to enhance a sense of control over time. Findings are discussed in relation to existing theories of time estimation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | The original article is available at www.ingentaconnect.com |
| Uncontrolled Discrete Keywords: | time management, time managers, planning, duration estimation |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
| Divisions: | College of Business, Psychology and Sport > Worcester Business School |
| Related URLs: | |
| Depositing User: | Jan Francis-Smythe |
| Date Deposited: | 11 Jan 2008 09:17 |
| Last Modified: | 08 Jun 2021 09:25 |
| URI: | https://eprints.worc.ac.uk/id/eprint/276 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |

Lists
Lists
