Worcester Research and Publications

SEARCH EPRINTS:

USER PANEL:

Registered Users - Log in using your University of Worcester ID and Password to submit items to the repository.

ABOUT THE COLLECTION:

WRaP is a collection of research papers and university publications. It presents the academic and creative work of the university. You are welcome to look for and obtain items of interest and make contact with the authors and creators.

CONTACT DETAILS:

All correspondence about WRaP should be sent to the Repository Manager.

The Review Process in Social work: Is it working for service users?

Lists

Tools

Lynes, M. and Sealey, Clive (2023) The Review Process in Social work: Is it working for service users? British Journal of Social Work, 53 (3). pp. 1674-1681. ISSN 0045-3102

	Text The Review Process in Social work 24.10.2022.docx - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (25kB) \| Request a copy
Preview	Text bcad013.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (142kB) \| Preview

Official URL: https://academic.oup.com/bjsw/article/53/3/1674/71...

Abstract

I have always thought that we as a society we should look into the role of the review process in social work. To explain briefly, when a care package is agreed for a service user, there is expected to be a review of that package very shortly afterwards. The review is carried out with the social worker, the service user, the carer/care organisation and any other interested party. This is to enable inevitable issues to be highlighted and improvements to the made to the care package for the longer term. The reason I feel that this issue needs to be looked at is as follows. When someone seeks help from their local authority, they are very likely needing support while undergoing some sort of crisis in their life. This could mean that the focus of their initial assessment or at least their role in the initial assessment is to deal with the immediate situation and need if they qualify, which is relevant at that point. They are then expected to take part in a review process very shortly after. This article will argue that there are 3 key issues with the review process as it currently stands.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare
Divisions:	College of Health, Life and Environmental Sciences > School of Allied Health and Community
Related URLs:	https://academic.oup.com/bjsw
Copyright Info:	Open Access article
Depositing User:	Clive Sealey
Date Deposited:	26 Oct 2022 10:30
Last Modified:	02 Nov 2023 11:15
URI:	https://eprints.worc.ac.uk/id/eprint/12585

Actions (login required)

View Item

Altmetric

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)

© University of Worcester Henwick Grove, WR2 6AJ Tel: 01905 855000 | Materials in WRaP are protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights. By using WRaP you agree to abide by UK copyright laws.

Worcester Research and Publications is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.