University of Worcester Worcester Research and Publications

Evaluating Validity and Test–retest Reliability in Four Drive for Muscularity Questionnaires

Tod, D., Morrison, T.G. and Edwards, Christian ORCID: (2012) Evaluating Validity and Test–retest Reliability in Four Drive for Muscularity Questionnaires. Body Image, 9 (3). pp. 425-428. ISSN 1740-1445

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)


The current study assessed relationships among four commonly used drive for muscularity questionnaires,
along with their 7 and 14 day test–retest reliability. Sample 1 was comprised of young British adult males (N = 272; MAGE = 20.3) who completed the questionnaires once. Sample 2, a group of young British adult males (N = 54, MAGE = 19.3), completed the questionnaires three times spaced 7 and 14 days apart. Correlations among Sample 1 ranged from .20 to .82 providing evidence for concurrent and discriminant validities. Evidence for test–retest reliability emerged with intraclass correlations ranging from .78 to .95 (p < .001) and generally nonsignificant t-tests (p > .05). Overall, the data support the psychometric
properties of the drive for muscularity inventories; however, the shared variance (35–67%) hints that
refinement is possible.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information:

The electronic full-text cannot be suppied for this item. Please check availability with your local library or Interlibrary Requests Service.

Uncontrolled Discrete Keywords: Drive for muscularity, Body image, Psychometrics,Concurrent validity, Discriminant validity, Test–retest reliability
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Divisions: College of Business, Psychology and Sport > School of Sport and Exercise Science
Depositing User: Christian Edwards
Date Deposited: 28 Sep 2012 09:27
Last Modified: 19 Dec 2020 04:00

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Worcester Research and Publications is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.