Tod , D and Morrison, T.G and Edwards, Christian (2012) Evaluating Validity and Test–retest Reliability in Four Drive for Muscularity Questionnaires. Body Image, 9 (3). pp. 425-428. ISSN 1740-1445
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S...
The current study assessed relationships among four commonly used drive for muscularity questionnaires, along with their 7 and 14 day test–retest reliability. Sample 1 was comprised of young British adult males (N = 272; MAGE = 20.3) who completed the questionnaires once. Sample 2, a group of young British adult males (N = 54, MAGE = 19.3), completed the questionnaires three times spaced 7 and 14 days apart. Correlations among Sample 1 ranged from .20 to .82 providing evidence for concurrent and discriminant validities. Evidence for test–retest reliability emerged with intraclass correlations ranging from .78 to .95 (p < .001) and generally nonsignificant t-tests (p > .05). Overall, the data support the psychometric properties of the drive for muscularity inventories; however, the shared variance (35–67%) hints that refinement is possible.
The electronic full-text cannot be suppied for this item. Please check availability with your local library or Interlibrary Requests Service.
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||Drive for muscularity, Body image, Psychometrics,Concurrent validity, Discriminant validity, Test–retest reliability|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)|
|Divisions:||Academic Departments > Institute of Sport and Exercise Science|
|Deposited By:||Christian Edwards|
|Deposited On:||28 Sep 2012 10:27|
|Last Modified:||28 Sep 2012 11:52|
Repository Staff Only: item control page