University of Worcester Worcester Research and Publications
 
  USER PANEL:
  ABOUT THE COLLECTION:
  CONTACT DETAILS:

Apple Pollination: Demand Depends on Variety and Supply Depends on Pollinator Identity

Garratt, M.P.D., Breeze, T.D., Boreux, V., Fountain, M.T., McKerchar, Megan, Webber, S.M., Coston, D.J., Jenner, N., Dean, R., Westbury, Duncan ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7094-0362, Biesmeijer, J.C. and Potts, S.G. (2016) Apple Pollination: Demand Depends on Variety and Supply Depends on Pollinator Identity. PLoS One. pp. 1-15. ISSN Print 1932-6203 Online 1932-6203

[thumbnail of Garratt et al_2016_Apple pollination.pdf]
Preview
Text
Garratt et al_2016_Apple pollination.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (281kB) | Preview

Abstract

Insect pollination underpins apple production but the extent to which different pollinator
guilds supply this service, particularly across different apple varieties, is unknown. Such
information is essential if appropriate orchard management practices are to be targeted and
proportional to the potential benefits pollinator species may provide. Here we use a novel
combination of pollinator effectiveness assays (floral visit effectiveness), orchard field surveys
(flower visitation rate) and pollinator dependence manipulations (pollinator exclusion
experiments) to quantify the supply of pollination services provided by four different pollinator
guilds to the production of four commercial varieties of apple. We show that not all pollinators
are equally effective at pollinating apples, with hoverflies being less effective than
solitary bees and bumblebees, and the relative abundance of different pollinator guilds visiting
apple flowers of different varieties varies significantly. Based on this, the taxa specific
economic benefits to UK apple production have been established. The contribution of insect
pollinators to the economic output in all varieties was estimated to be £92.1M across the
UK, with contributions varying widely across taxa: solitary bees (£51.4M), honeybees
(£21.4M), bumblebees (£18.6M) and hoverflies (£0.7M). This research highlights the differences
in the economic benefits of four insect pollinator guilds to four major apple varieties in
the UK. This information is essential to underpin appropriate investment in pollination services
management and provides a model that can be used in other entomolophilous crops
to improve our understanding of crop pollination ecology.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information:

The full-text of the online published article can be accessed via the Official URL.
Copyright: © 2016 Garratt et al. This is an open
access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original author and source are
credited.

Uncontrolled Discrete Keywords: apple pollination, economics, insects, pollination, honey bees, SERG
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Divisions: College of Health, Life and Environmental Sciences > School of Science and the Environment
Related URLs:
Copyright Info: Open Access Journal
Depositing User: Janet Davidson
Date Deposited: 14 Jun 2016 13:58
Last Modified: 17 Dec 2020 10:29
URI: https://eprints.worc.ac.uk/id/eprint/4534

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
 
     
Worcester Research and Publications is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.