University of Worcester Worcester Research and Publications

An Assessment of Variants in the Professional Judgement of Geomorphologically-based Channel Types.

Milner, Victoria S., Gilvear, D.J. and Willby, N.J. (2013) An Assessment of Variants in the Professional Judgement of Geomorphologically-based Channel Types. River Research and Applications, 29 (2). pp. 236-249. ISSN Online: 1535-1467

PDF (An assessment of variant in the professional judgement of geomorphologically-based channel types )
An_assessment_of_variants_in_the_prof_judgement_of_geomorph_based_channel_types.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (2MB) | Preview


River classification is a useful tool for researchers and managers wishing to organise, simplify and understand the forms and processes within freshwater systems. Many classifications require surveyors to classify reaches into specific channel types in a field environment. Channel types should be identifiable based on a field surveyor’s
judgement of channel characteristics and landscape settings; these include channel planform, valley confinement, dominant bed material, and/or instream geomorphic features (e.g. gravel bars). Accurate classification of reaches into the correct channel
type is important to ensure consistency in management strategies, and to assess the impact of engineering activities on the physical and ecological status of rivers. In this paper, we examine the variation in professional judgement of geomorphologically based channel types by scientists with different disciplinary backgrounds, and varying levels of involvement in classification systems using a photo-questionnaire. Results indicate that there can be a large level of discrepancy in typing rivers; the choice of the modal channel type for each reach varied between 25.9% and 75.1% of the respondent selections. There were also differences in the level of agreement between
earth scientists (with hydrogeomorphological or geological training), ecological scientists (with freshwater biology training) and practitioners involved in river conservation and management. A high level of experience in classification systems translates to a lower number of channel types being chosen per reach. In response to these results, the use of a photographic approach to typing needs to be fully tested and users fully trained before operational use. Furthermore, we advocate that designers of
geomorphic typologies should aim to have a representative and workable number of classes within a typology with an emphasis for rationalisation of classes rather than expansion of numbers.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information:

Staff and students at the University of Worcester can access the full-text via the Official URL. External users should check availability with their local library or Interlibrary Requests Service.

Uncontrolled Discrete Keywords: channel type, professional judgement, river classifications, river typologies, channel morphology
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GB Physical geography
Divisions: College of Health, Life and Environmental Sciences > School of Science and the Environment
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Tory Milner
Date Deposited: 25 Oct 2012 09:50
Last Modified: 17 Jun 2020 16:58

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Worcester Research and Publications is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.