University of Worcester Worcester Research and Publications
 
  USER PANEL:
  ABOUT THE COLLECTION:
  CONTACT DETAILS:

Patients’ and clinicians’ views on the optimum schedules for self-monitoring of blood pressure: a qualitative focus group and interview study

Grant, Sabrina ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0148-9103, Hodgkinson, J.A., Milner, S.L., Martin, U., Tompson, A., Hobbs, F.D.R., Mant, J., McManus, R.J. and Greenfield, S.M. (2016) Patients’ and clinicians’ views on the optimum schedules for self-monitoring of blood pressure: a qualitative focus group and interview study. British Journal of General Practice, 66 (652). e819-e830. ISSN Print: 0960-1643 Online: 1478-5243

[img]
Preview
Text
Grant05_AAM_withcover.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (312kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background Self-monitoring of blood pressure is common but guidance on how it should be carried out varies and it is currently unclear how such guidance is viewed.Aim To explore patients’ and healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) views and experiences of the use of different self-monitoring regimens to determine what is acceptable and feasible, and to inform future recommendations.Design and setting Thirteen focus groups and four HCP interviews were held, with a total of 66 participants (41 patients and 25 HCPs) from primary and secondary care with and without experience of self-monitoring.Method Standard and shortened self-monitoring protocols were both considered. Focus groups and interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using the constant comparative method.Results Patients generally supported structured schedules but with sufficient flexibility to allow adaptation to individual routine. They preferred a shorter (3-day) schedule to longer (7-day) regimens. Although HCPs could describe benefits for patients of using a schedule, they were reluctant to recommend a specific schedule. Concerns surrounded the use of different schedules for diagnosis and subsequent monitoring. Appropriate education was seen as vital by all participants to enable a self-monitoring schedule to be followed at home.Conclusion There is not a ‘one size fits all approach’ to developing the optimum protocol from the perspective of users and those implementing it. An approach whereby patients are asked to complete the minimum number of readings required for accurate blood pressure estimation in a flexible manner seems most likely to succeed. Informative advice and guidance should incorporate such flexibility for patients and professionals alike.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information:

Copyright © 2016 British Journal of General Practice. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from the Royal College of General Practitioners at: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X686149

Staff and students at the University of Worcester can access the full-text of the online published article via the UW online library search. External users should check availability with their local library or Interlibrary Requests Service.

Uncontrolled Keywords: blood pressure, focus groups, hypertension, primary health care, secondary care, self-monitoring
Divisions: Divisions (2019 onwards) > College of Health, Life and Environmental Sciences > School of Nursing and Midwifery
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Dr Sabrina Grant
Date Deposited: 18 Oct 2019 15:00
Last Modified: 18 Oct 2019 15:00
URI: https://eprints.worc.ac.uk/id/eprint/8764

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
 
     
Worcester Research and Publications is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.