University of Worcester Worcester Research and Publications
 
  USER PANEL:
  ABOUT THE COLLECTION:
  CONTACT DETAILS:

Can the Revised UK Code Direct Practice?

Snelling, Paul (2017) Can the Revised UK Code Direct Practice? Nursing Ethics, 24 (4). pp. 392-407. ISSN Print: 0969-7330 Online: 1477-0989

[img]
Preview
Text
Can the revised UK Code direct pratice.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (493kB) | Preview

Abstract

The Nursing and Midwifery Council, the United Kingdom regulator of nursing and midwifery has recently revised its professional code of practice. This paper begins by arguing that a professional code must be capable of sustaining close reading and of action guidance. Using four exemplar clauses it is argued that the new revised code does not met this purpose. First, I show that in setting out requirements for consent and documentation, the meaning of the relevant clause has changed significantly during the editing process so that a literal reading of the final document bears little relation to established professional practice. Second, I argue that the clause concerning the nature of professional relationships has also been altered during the editing process so that it is inconsistent with other professional groups and established accounts of the professional nurse-patient relationship. Third, I argue that the clause concerning disclosure of confidential information, which survived revision and editing with its meaning intact is nevertheless factually incorrect and inconsistent with UK law and authoritative guidance. Finally, fourth, I argue that use of the word ‘inappropriate’ is inappropriate as it amounts to meaningless circularity, discussed in relation to a clause on expressing personal beliefs. Taken together, these examples demonstrate that the Code is seriously flawed and does not fulfil its purpose. One way that simple prescriptive clauses in the Code can be usefully understood is through the provision of detailed guidance. I argue that the NMC has changed its position on its view of the value of guidance and has significantly reduced the amount of written guidance and advice is provides. The paper concludes by arguing that in order to meet its action directing function, further clarifying revision and the provision of detailed guidance is required.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information:

Staff and students at the University of Worcester can access the published version via the UW online library service. External users should check availability with their local library or Interlibrary Requests service.

Uncontrolled Keywords: professional regulation, Code of conduct, confidentiality, professional relationships
Subjects: R Medicine > RT Nursing
Divisions: Academic Departments > Institute of Health and Society
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Paul Snelling
Date Deposited: 14 Oct 2015 12:46
Last Modified: 26 Jun 2017 14:37
URI: https://eprints.worc.ac.uk/id/eprint/4009

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
 
     
Worcester Research and Publications is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.